Volcanic Ash blowing over Lancashire

Today, flights all over northern Britain have been grounded because of volcanic ash from Iceland. Quite a coincidence to have these northerly winds at the same time as a volcano erupts. Look out for bright sunsets.

Many years ago a BA flight over Malaysia flew into a volcanic cloud, all four engines went out and the windscreen was sandblasted. A great story if you can find the full transcript. After gliding out of the ash the pilot managed to restart the engines but couldn’t see out of the windscreen. He landed successfully to much acclaim.

You might think the aircraft could fly lower or higher where there is less ash. Aircraft fly into desert airports with sand blowing about. Is this an over-reaction and total risk aversion. A bit of a surprise to wake up with this announcement when nothing had been publicly threatened as late as 11pm last night and the volcano has been erupting for some time. Also not a lot of news about how long this might continue and what flight alternatives are being offered people. Overall seems to be being covered more like a show than a major disruption. Few questions are being asked about whether it’s an over-reaction and why was there no notice.

High Speed Rail from Manchester, not Preston, announced

The government announced its proposed 250mph High Speed Rail link plan today with a Y shaped network. The line to Birmingham from Euston is to be first followed by a line to Manchester and a separate one from Birmingham to Sheffield and Leeds. With the first full speed trains running all the way to Birmingham around 2027.

Sounds great but still a lot of questions to be asked.  The biggest one being will it ever reach Preston.

Will there be a full capability link to Scotland.  Will it go up the west or east coast or both or remain a slower line. Liverpool is on a spur from Manchester so will Glasgow be on a spur from Edinburgh via Newcastle on the east coast.  That could mean Preston missing out. 

Protests from people living on the route will be considered with one person in the Chilterns saying they aren’t convinced of its value – yet living only 20 miles from London it has no value to them. Although I wouldn’t want the line near us particularly if it spoilt nice areas of green.  The M40 cuts through the Chilterns and has created an ugly gash in Englands green and pleasant, lets do better than that.  Maybe using the existing West Coast Line in that area is a better solution although it might lead to years of unacceptable disruption.

The Conservatives are listening to the people on the route and looking at a line via Heathrow.   That seems to have some sense as cutting out flights is one of its purposes. Although a line further west via Heathrow might be less politically messy for the Conservatives or is it just expediency not to announce it now.

The other issue is the timeframe. It’s so far in the future that it might be overtaken by technology.  The Conservatives have said they’ll pull it 2 years forward which sounds better but not good enough.  It should be planned for it to run to Manchester in 2020 at the latest although it is said we can only afford £2bn a year and the London crossrail is spending that till 2017.

The technology will probably all be imported into the country that built the first trains. Surely we can do better than that, where are the British companies that can do this.

Other countries are now building trains that run on magnetic fields and by 2027 will the HST begin to look like the stagecoach and horses. The canals and original railways were built quicker.

Another influence will be for Preston to be the link for the north west, outside Manchester. Building Tithebarn will make Preston that much more of a convincing destination.

This line, if it was available now would change the idea of travel and bring more wealth to every area it touches. It would be possible to commute to London. Birmingham would be a stones throw away from most regions. Reducing flights from Manchester to London as well. The downside of that is that the prices would need to be high or the line won’t have enough capacity. To have fast trains from Glasgow, Manchester, Leeds converging with the Birmingham trains on one line will have an almost constant frequency.

The French found that they built too many stations and it slowed the line and reduced capacity so the regional philosophy sounds about right.

 The line is planned to within 5 metres it is said so lots to think about, need more information.

Space Shuttle – International Space Station over Preston

Missed it again.  Friday morning, 19th Feb,  at 5.26am the Space Shuttle, Endeavour, and the International Space Station flew over Preston before separating, it was 200 miles high at 36 degrees  above the horizon so not directly overhead. Very bright as well.

Endeavour is scheduled to land in Florida on Sunday but bad weather might make it land in California. I have a friend in Los Angeles who says they hear the sonic boom as it approaches. I’d love to see and hear that.

www.spaceweather.com

Island of Preston

The Coastal Management Plan for the next 100 years has been issued and the coast around the Ribble estuary is largely to be protected except for an area on the south bank that will be allowed to make a managed change.

A bit of a surprise as 10 years ago it was common to see maps showing Preston on the coast with the Fylde underwater except for a few islands by 2050.  Ten years on maybe the rate of change doesn’t make it sound probable anymore.

Reading that further does it make the climate change warnings overall seem a bit more distant and with a lesser scale.

Combined Heat and Power from Baxi

Baxi say they are geared up to deliver up to 20,000 combined heat and power units a year from their Preston, Bamber Bridge, plant. 

The government is issuing contracts worth billions of pounds for green energy but the great majority of the manufacturing work is expected to go overseas.  Combined Heat and Power (CHP)  isn’t regarded as a ‘green’ technology in government terms although it gives the capability to return power to the grid or for use in the building reducing dependence on the grid. It’s downside being that it is still using gas. So no government green manufacturing contracts are coming to Preston for this.  They’re going to Germany and Denmark, perhaps China.

Micro-CHP sounds an interesting solution but I don’t know a lot about it.  Is it more efficient to generate electricity in small generators, does that adequately offset the distribution costs and need to import?  Baxi claim their domestic unit, the Ecogen, is 90% efficient compared to 35% efficiency for grid electricity. 

Security of supply is a good point, as we did have an electricity black-out for one hour last month and for several hours 2 years ago, in the final stages of X-factor as well, but I don’t think I’d spend much to reduce the risk. You’d need a smart meter as well I’d think.  At the end of the day I’d be looking at how much the boiler costs and how much my gas and electricity bill will change. That’s why green often doesn’t get bought, it’s not cost efficient and a government grant is needed.

Baxi also supply a Ground Sourced Heat Pump although it isn’t known where that is made, probably not Preston.  I’ve read good things about these and might take a further look.

Perhaps we could take advantage of the governments £400 boiler scrappage scheme.  Notice that B&Q are selling a boiler for £399 so do you get a pound back and find you’re own fitter. Surprising that I read that a new boiler typically costs about £2000 to install.  The pipes are there and so is the gas,  if that is the case it costs £1600 to remove and fit the boiler, then adjust a couple of feet of pipe. Should take under a day.  Nice work if you can get it.  Our house has warm air heating and the previous owner bought a new boiler that cost a lot more than £399.

Found this on the Baxi website. Quote:

What is mCHP?

Combined heat and power (CHP), or cogeneration, is the simultaneous production of useful heat and electricity from a single source. Large scale CHP, suitable for industrial and commercial applications, has been around for some time.

Micro or Mini-CHP (mCHP) refers to the small-scale production of heat and power for  individual commercial buildings, apartments and individual homes. These units meet the demand for space heating and hot water whilst providing electricity to supplement or replace the grid supply.

Why mCHP?

mCHP is a true low (or zero) carbon alternative to a gas boiler.

Installation of mCHP appliances – in existing or new buildings – can be more cost-effective and less disruptive compared to other renewable and low carbon technologies, as installation and servicing relies largely on current skills required for heating installation.

What are the benefits of mCHP?

  • Carbon emissions are reduced by generating electricity at the point of use – avoiding the system losses associated with central power production.
  • Economic savings are generated for the user, by reducing imported electricity and by selling surplus electricity back to the grid.
  • Security of supply is greatly enhanced by reducing reliance on centralised power production

End of quote from Baxi website.

High Speed Rail to miss Preston?

The High Speed 2 Company submitted its plans to Lord Adonis who will declare the preferred routes in March 2010.  To date the proposal has shown a line up the west coast via Preston to Glasgow but yesterdays newspapers seemed cooler on this idea.  The routes being showed seem to favour going to Leeds from Manchester and then to Newcastle with Glasgow being fed via Edinburgh. With a route via Nottingham, Sheffield to Leeds as well. One paper said the Conservatives favoured the east coast route to Scotland, missing Preston, and that Lord Adonis is trying to get all party agreement on the routes.

Politics will play as big a part as economics in the decisions. Already noises are being made about damage to the countryside and cities are vying to get a station on the route. This matches the French experience where too many stations were built as a political sop and made the service less attractive.

The timescale for the service is also much too prolonged.  To say the service will start to Birmingham in 2025 means the north won’t be linked possibly for 30 years.  By then the technology will be on the verge of obsolescence.  High speed rail has been around for 40 years now, after 70 years most transport technologies are looking old.

Making the service available in under 10 years could bring a boom. With London 1 hour from the northern cities it could transform work and leisure.

If Preston doesn’t get this line it will damage the local economy and the north west beyond Manchester will become a remote area. This space needs watching.

Digital Switchover Day – 2nd Dec 2009

What a shock only a black and white fuzz on  TV.  After watching it for a while decided to tell my old aunt that the signal had gone off. It wasn’t the signal that bothered her though,  it was the new remote. So complicated with buttons very close together.  I knew it was to be a long morning.

The digital switch-over man had been 2 months ago but my aunt said she’d use it on the day so thought I’d better make sure I was there. I’m so clever with the technology so taking the new remote I clicked and found it didn’t work. What am I going to do, there’ll be a fuss.   But then I noticed the new box light started blinking and thought it must be getting new channels automatically.  No such luck so I diverted my aunt while I fiddled with the remote. After about 10 minutes a blue picture came on.  Flicking through a few menu’s decided ‘new’ set up would be just the job and amazingly it appeared to be scanning for channels although the man set it up 2 months ago.  Relief when BBC came on.

That was only the beginning with my aunt looking at this remote and saying she wanted her old one. So I took out the battery, I knew she’d use the old one and mess up the TV. She did. It must have had one final button push of power without the battery.  Anyway with my beautiful diagram listing only the 5 buttons needed on the new remote there was some  channel switching and volume up and down.  A bit of TV off, then after saying don’t turn off the digital box, off it went.  The button is next to the TV off button. It got a bit complicated and my aunt threw the remote down and said put on the radio.

The next thing was the ITV button. I’m thinking what ITV button.  Oh, the TV button for on and off.  She says why doesn’t it say on and off, why does it say TV (or even ITV according to my aunt).  The other button is for the digital box. Digital box!   Oh my gosh. On leaving she was using the remote but will the TV work tomorrow.  Will it go off tonight?

Digital switchover, try telling an octogenarian who has a lifetime achievement for technophobia.

International Space Station over Preston

The International Space Station with Space Shuttle Atlantis was visible from Preston yesterday morning (24th Nov) at 4.46 and it was very bright (if no clouds), I was in bed and it was probably raining.

Atlantis undocked from the International Space Station (ISS)  last night just before midnight, GMT.   Their separation sets the stage for  double flybys of many towns and cities, but not Preston, today, Nov. 25th, when Atlantis and the ISS will soar through the night sky side by side–a fantastic sight.

Atlantis scheduled to land Friday morning, Nov. 27th, so the double apparitions will continue on Thursday, Nov. 26th, Thanksgiving in the United States.

No sightings of bright satellites are forecast for the next 10 days from Preston although the ISS is visible from London, low in the sky, early Friday morning.

Reported by www.SpaceWeather.com, Simple Satellite Tracker.  Tuesday 24th Nov 2009 from Preston:   Time of rising: 04:46:33 pm,   Direction to look:  W,     Time of transition:  04:48:46,      Max elevation:  37°,    Magnitude: -2.7 (very bright).

Digital Switchover and further to HD

Wednesday 2nd December the freeview digital changeover will be complete in the Granada region. Also the power at the transmitter becomes 10 times stronger. Wow does that make our aerial glow? Probably not, I’ll add just in case someone thinks it does.

On that day all you’ll get is a crackly screen if you switch on without a digital tuner. All channels will only be watchable in digital format.

As if that wasn’t enough it was announced this week that Winter Hill transmitter will go to HD standard for Manchester in December 2009 and in March 2010 the rest of the Granada region will go HD.  In addition to the non-HD that is.

Does that mean that if you bought a new set top box for the changeover you’ll need another? Also does that mean you will need an HD TV?  You’ll need to check your box but it will need an HD compatible box and TV if you want to watch HD. Although you can buy TV’s with freeview or satellite tuners inside that don’t need a box.

What about my video recorder? Yes, it will only video at the standard it’s able to be tuned to. Digital standard or HD 920P etc.

I’ve never been sure exactly what HD TV is. You read 920P and 1080P TV’s are HD. I also read that Sky HD and FreeSat HD have better HD which is 1920P, that’s over twice as good definition as 920.  Then there is framerate or the number of times the picture is refreshed. Also MPEG4 and DVD-T2.  MPEG4 is a video format like MP3 is a sound format,  and DVD-T2 is a new transmission format for HD.

The flat screen TV’s have plasma, lcd or led screens. LED are the latest. They have light emitting diodes, led, behind the lcd screen that give a smoother light coverage and can be switched off in sections to give total black. Apparently total black is difficult on TV’s. Just to make life a bit more complicated each manufacturer does it a bit differently.

3D is on its way. Will that need red and green spectacles? I don’t know although it’s hard to imagine how it can be done without some kind of eye vision adjuster.

If you look too deep it’s hellish.  We have a cathode ray tube TV which seems pretty good to me and is too heavy to move.

I could go on about radio as well. The government wants us to throw away our FM radios and go DAB by 2015 even though DAB is an inferior sound quality.

Nuclear Irish Sea announced

Today the government announced 5 new nuclear power stations on the shore of the Irish Sea. Three in Cumbria, 1 at Heysham, 1 in Anglesey. There are currently 3 that have limited life remaining.

The government has also announced a ‘quick’ planning process which some people say will over-rule peoples rights. In general the location of the sites in this area are in places where nuclear stations exist and the jobs they bring are welcomed. So planning is not likely to be a major obstacle anyway.

The Irish Sea already has banks of wind turbines and more are planned. The hills of the Lake District and Lancashire have groups of wind turbines and more of those are planned.

It is forecast that electrical demand will increase by 10% in the next 10 years although this could be reduced as easily as building a new power station.

Overall nuclear is a necessary part of the energy supply system to ensure capacity is sufficient.

Digital Switchover Day for BBC2

Yesterday BBC2 went digital in the Granada region. The person managing the changeover said they’d only had 10,000 calls yesterday so it went well.  At the time I thought it sounds a lot as BBC2 doesn’t get a big audience. Later I found that those who already have a digital box need to retune both BBC1 and BBC2 so it isn’t just a switch off.  I thought I was clued up on this but now know I’m not. Just found that BBC1,2 and Sky News isn’t working on the box attached to my PC so need to do the retune.

There was a retune only a few weeks ago so don’t know why there is another. Sounds too complicated to me why don’t these boxes retune themselves automatically.

December 2nd for the full change-over. Can’t wait, I have an elderly relative who doesn’t understand the new remote and keeps using their old one and says they won’t watch BBC2 for now.

Internet Explorer Version 8 and 10 minutes to get football results in the brave new digital TV world

As a part-time web designer I find IE8 has gone from the extreme of earlier issues to the other extreme in terms of using web-standards. My web-design software puts special code into pages to allow for the foibles of earlier versions of Internet Explorer. Now I find that even using the latest updates from Adobe to create code the CSS on my sites doesn’t render correctly in IE8 without clicking on ‘compatibility view’ which I’m not using.

Who-ever in Microsoft invented ‘compatibility view’ must have had a very strict upbringing, it’s a completely unnecessary discipline. Firefox has been the recommended tool for checking websites and I find nothing has changed.

Microsoft also upset some people by enforcing use of the Outlook Connector on Hotmail accounts.  It forced me to tidy up my e-mail accounts and it was goodbye to Hotmail.  If you own domains you can use forwarding addresses so changing isn’t difficult.

The latest version of Windows (Windows 7) is out tomorrow and seems to have had good reviews to date.  I’ll let it settle as Vista seems pretty good now.  Although I wonder if we’ll ever get to the time when you turn on your PC and start work immediately. My Quad core Vista PC takes minutes to boot up.

With the digital switch-over I’ll miss terrestrial TV teletext in that I can put on the TV and go straight to the football results in seconds – unless it’s one of those multi-page ones. The BBC Digital Text on Sky takes about 2 minutes to come on and switching it off is something else.  Maybe using mobile phone web is the faster answer but it costs. We step bravely into the future and it seems like walking in mud, overly complicated mud.

What about older folk. It wasn’t too bad once just turning a switch to operate the TV.  We once had a TV with a little box screwed on the back containing a fairly substantial metal rod which you pulled to get ITV. Set top boxes aren’t new.

Oh no, just remembered we turn off our Sky Box as a ‘green’ measure but find that after switch on it takes 5 minutes to find all the channels.  Teletext will be so missed. It’ll be 5 minutes to get the channels, 2 minutes to get to the text.  Then another couple of minutes to load the page. So it could be 10 minutes to get the football results with a Sky Box. Need to think about that!

Duke of Edinburgh’s wise words about TV technology

The Duke of Edinburgh is reported as saying TV remotes are too complex.   I guess over 95% of the population are probably able to use them eventually without difficulty even if they don’t use all the functions. I have an elderly relative who now has a Set Top Box as part of the BBC / Government scheme for the elderly and hasn’t yet been able to master the technology.  Got the box fitted by a friendly young man, got some training, we wrote it down and repeated it several times. What it doesn’t say is what happens if you accidently catch the button next to the TV on button. Yes it turns the whole thing off. So what happens then. Panic.  I thought it can’t be that bad and had a go. But I got an information screen with a small window showing the picture and I couldn’t get rid of it without turning everything off. There’s a lag as well so you can’t be certain if the button you last pressed is about to do something or if you missed it. So yes the Duke of Edinburgh is right.  Where is the remote with just a few buttons?  Why the lag between press and effect?

The Government are hell bent on turning off FM radio as well. The UK has taken an independant route using a low fidelity first generation DAB technology and the rest of Europe is different. I’ve had a high quality FM receiver for years, it will probably outlast me and gives excellent sound reproduction that I also feed the TV through.  In 4 years it will go to landfill because the government wants to use the spectrum for mobile phones or something.  So here we go again high tech, low quality.

Councillors Driver and Hudson man the barricades

Two councillors, Geoff Driver of Lancashire County Council and Ken Hudson of Preston City Council have had a letter published in the Times (8th Oct)  defending the location of the National Football Museum in Preston.  This was after Matt Dickinson the Times Chief Sports Correspondent had written the museum should be at Wembley (6thOct).

Matt said he liked the museum but it’s one drawback was it is in Preston. Well he would say that as it’s a typical London reaction to anything they have to travel to even though Preston is surrounded by Premier and Football League clubs.  Last time I went to London we passed Wembley at 100 mph and it was quite a journey to Euston. On my previous trip from central London to Wembley I got a headache from the long slow claustrophobic journey, we don’t have such horror journey’s in our area.  Would anyone make such a such a journey to go to the museum when there is so much else to see in London?  At Preston you slip off the motorway and in under 10 minutes you are in the museum having parked free and suffered little traffic.

Another advantage of Preston is that the club is fairly neutral. I’ve met people in Liverpool who won’t go to Manchester or even say the word.  

There is a previous post setting these points out more clearly so I leave that topic.

Changing the subject a bit, I hope Rupert Murdoch won’t be upset that I’ve referenced one of his news products without paying an on-line news fee, ref todays Times. Then again I have paid £1.80 for the two copies of the Times and I think that’s excessive even though the main paper is a good read. Can I have a cheaper option without the unwanted supplements. If a charge for internet news comes in one of them will go.  Although I would imagine that a fee for viewing a package of publications could be arranged as I can’t see anyone paying to read a single news source on line.  I think I’d agree that a moderate fee for viewing a range of news sources might be acceptable although I’d have to consider my whole internet / newspaper / TV package  as I don’t believe in giving a monopoly or tying myself in to any one provider.

Preston FM your community radio

Driving round Preston the other day a radio station I hadn’t heard of popped onto my radio. Preston FM 103.2MHz. Sounded a bit ‘localish’ although I’ve listened to a couple of their music programmes and they’re OK. So I’m giving it a go through their on-line feed at the moment. The schedule says ‘chat’ show but it’s been uninterrupted music.  As a volunteer and charity funded station it’s worth a go.

If you’re living overseas and want to hear some homely Preston voices then maybe there’s a good reason to listen on line.

Maybe they should do some traffic announcements as that seems to be how most stations get listeners although for me it also can cause hostility. comm

Preston FM website:

http://www.preston.fm/component/option,com_frontpage/Itemid,1/

BAE SYSTEMS and SFO

BAE SYSTEMS, the biggest high tech employer in Lancashire and the UK, is in the news today. The Serious Fraud Office are saying they will ask the Attorney General to press charges with a punitive £1000 million fine for offering alleged incentives to obtain business in 2 EU and 2 African countries.   This is on top of the talk of defence cuts that might injure BAE.

The Lib Dem spokesman is in for the kill, appearing on every broadcast, adamant that this is shocking behaviour although his opinion on other similar shocking behaviour isn’t widely known so maybe he doesn’t like the defence industry.

Just before an election will Gordon Brown fire these arrows into the heart of Britains largest manufacturing company or is he more pragmatic?  BAE SYSTEMS has changed its management and is reported to be agreeable to some compromise.

In the last 10 years large British manufacturing businesses have nearly all disappeared or been taken over by foreign companies.  An injured company with good products is prey.

Take the water companies they were said to be too fat so they got a windfall tax. Next thing they are owned by the French.  How much will BAE be damaged, the shares went down 4% today which doesn’t seem too much although they had already fallen in the last few weeks.  How much will this injure the company and who would be interested in taking the business or breaking it up?

Sustainable house standards – 2016 and all that

There has been talk in the news recently about the standards for houses to meet ‘low carbon’ requirements.

Developers say it will cost £30,000 to meet the 2016 ‘zero carbon’ standard. Although it is also said the cost is overstated and the effect understated. It would be interesting to see a breakdown of this cost as newly fitted thicker insulation and efficient boilers probably don’t cost a lot more. So there must be some big cost drivers to be exposed.

Below I’ve found some examples of what it might entail. It seems only the self generating capacity is a significant new cost. The cost of this would come down if it became widespread. Also  local areas could install their own systems to reduce costs.

Then there is the forecast cost of fuel. There are websites saying energy costs could reach £5000 a year if price increases over the last few years continue. Obviously this depends on the dates you pick and maybe if you picked the last 12 months then energy costs could be forecast to be zero in 20 years. So what is a reasonable figure?

A lot depends on cost effectiveness as we can’t spend limitlessly on the assumption of global warming. For example if we insulate and the temperature goes up then maybe we don’t need it. If it rains all the time then maybe solar power won’t do much good. Wind seems probable, etc. Is any of this based on metereological data and reasonable assumptions?

I’ve a lot to find out to be convinced, particularly being wary of who is presenting what figures and why. Although in general I support minimising human effect on the environment for whatever purpose if it creates a better Earth for everything on it.

The government issued a paper on house standards, dated 2006.  It uses code levels to cover the standard.

Level 1 is slightly better than todays regulations. An example of what might meet the standard;

The home will have to be 10% more energy efficient than one built to the 2006 Building Regulations standards. This could be achieved by:
• Improving the thermal efficiency of the walls, windows, and roof (by using more insulation or better glass for example);
• Reducing air permeability, that is by improving the control of the fresh air into a home, and the stale air out of a home. (A certain amount of air ventilation is needed in a home for health reasons);
• Installing a high efficiency condensing boiler;
• Carefully designing the fabric of the home to reduce thermal bridging (thermal bridging allows heat to easily escape between the inner walls and the outer walls of a home).
The home will have to be designed to use no more than about 120 litres of water per person per day. This could be achieved by fitting a number of items such as:
• 6/4 Dual Flush WC;
• Flow Reducing/Aerating taps throughout;
• 6-9 litres per minute shower (note that an average electric shower is about 6/7 litres per minute;
• 18ltr maximum volume dishwasher;
• 60ltr maximum volume washing machine.
Other minimum requirements are required for:
• Surface water management – this may mean the provision of soakaways and areas of porous paving;
• Materials – this means a minimum number of materials meeting at least a ‘D’ grade in the Building Research Establishment’s Green Guide (the scale goes from A+ to E);
• Waste management – this means having a site waste management plan in place during the home’s construction, and adequate space for waste storage during its use.

But to get to Level 1 you need a further 33.3 points. So the builder/developer must do other things to obtain the other points such as:
• Providing accessible drying space (so that tumble dryers need not be used);
• Providing more energy efficient lighting (taking into account the needs of disabled people with visual impairments);
• Providing cycle storage;
• Providing a room that can be easily set up as a home office;
• Reducing the amount of water than runs off the site into the storm drains;
• Using environmentally friendly materials;
• Providing recycling capacity either inside or outside the home.

Level 6 Example of a Carbon Neutral house for 2016;

The home meeting any level of the Code will have to meet minimum standards for certain items depending on what Level is desired. For Level 6 this means:
The home will have to be completely zero carbon (i.e. zero net emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) from all energy use in the home). This could be achieved by:
• Improving the thermal efficiency of the walls, windows, and roof as far as is practically possible (by using more insulation or better glass for example);
• Reducing air permeability to the minimum consistent with health requirements (a certain amount of air ventilation is needed in a home for health reasons);
• Installing a high efficiency condensing boiler, or being on a district heating system;
• Carefully designing the fabric of the home to reduce thermal bridging (thermal bridging allows heat to easily escape between the inner walls and the outer walls of a home);
• Using low and zero carbon technologies such as solar thermal panels, biomass boilers, wind turbines, and combined heat and power systems (CHP). It would mean for example that energy taken from the national grid would have to be replaced by low or zero carbon generated energy, so that over a year the net emissions were zero.

The home will have to be designed to use no more than about 80 litres of water per person per day. This could be achieved by fitting such items as:
• 6/4 Dual Flush WC;
• Flow Reducing/Aerating taps throughout;
• 6-9 litres per minute shower (note that an average electric shower is about 6/7 litres per minute);
• a smaller, shaped bath – still long enough to lie down in, but less water required to fill it to a level consistent with personal comfort;
• 18ltr maximum volume dishwasher;
• 60ltr maximum volume washing machine.
To achieve the standard would also mean that about 30% of the water requirement of the home was provided from non-potable sources such as rainwater harvesting systems or grey water recycling systems.
Other minimum requirements are required for:
• Surface water management – this may mean the provision of soakaways and areas of porous paving;
• Materials – this means a minimum number of materials meeting at least a ‘D’ grade in the Building Research Establishment’s Green Guide (the scale goes from A+ to E);
• Waste management – this means having a site waste management plan in place during the home’s construction, and adequate space for waste storage during its use.
But to get to Level 6 you need a further 64.9 points. So the builder/developer must do many other things to obtain the other points. In fact they will need to do 90% of everything in the

Code to achieve Level 6, including:
• Energy efficient appliances, and lighting;
• Supplying accessible water butts;
• Reducing surface water run-off as much as possible;
• Using highly environmentally friendly materials;
• Minimising construction waste;
• Maximum, accessible provision for recycling;
• Improved daylighting, sound insulation and security;
• Building to the Lifetime Homes standard;
• Assessing and minimising the ecological impact of the construction of the home.

Is the above Good or Bad?

With the exception of generating power there is nothing there that looks particularly taxing. I’m not sure what grade D materials are though. In general I support it but want to watch the costs.

Retrofitting a lot of the existing housing will be a big challenge and the use of home generating sounds idealistic. I’d assume that localities could take it in their own hands to set up local power generators.  Also windows and walls could be expensive to replace before they are worn and maybe there is no economic case for doing this unless energy prices increase significantly. One council fitted external cladding to houses at a cost of £4000 to £6000 a house. There are about 25 million dwellings in the UK and only about 100,000 are being built at present so the new standards will take a very long time to have any effect if they are restricted to new build.

The 2006 code for sustainable homes is on the link below.

http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/code_for_sust_homes.pdf

Smart Meters, any use?

I was reading an article by Ed Milliband saying smart meters will give us a responsive more efficient electricity grid, enable billing without a meter reader and for consumers to be aware of what they using. All this at a cost of a few £bn.

Maybe we’re unusual but I can’t imagine any savings in our house. I know the hot water, freezer, electric cooker, tv, pc and lights use electricity.  We don’t leave switches or heat only the air. My own concern is that someone said that a person in Sweden saved 15% of their fuel, but that this was the only person and they left the fire on all day.

I just can’t see how reducing meter men and getting adjustable bills can be worth the cost.  The power companies are pretty good at regulating output and it’s a blunt instrument with whole power stations going on and off.   They did say that it would allow people to feed into the grid, although I would have thought that these exceptions would buy their own meter. If this is so good then presumably the power companies are funding it at no extra cost to anyone?

The other device I saw advertised was a voltage regulator that claims to reduce bills by reducing your voltage to 230Volts. It was aimed at businesses and domestic. In our house maybe our TV will work on 230V but our immersion heater will just give out less power and so be on longer. The freezer might work the same at 230V as it said motors show savings. At a cost of £300 to £400 installed that’s a years electricity for us and it would probably take over 10 years to pay back, if ever. Some hard facts about savings on different appliances would be useful.

Wind Turbine near Garstang

A planning debate on a new Wind Turbine near Garstang has been on-going for nearly 2 years and it appears that the turbine is to be built after the local council was over-ridden by the Planning Inspectorate. 

This is an interesting microcosm of a national debate where it is said that over half of the planned ‘green’ energy turbines are being blocked by local opposition. The old debate about national need v local inconvenience. 

The single turbine near Garstang is about 500 metres from the nearest house and has a mast 80m (250ft) high and turbines that extend to 120m (400ft) high. It will generate up to 1MW of power for the Dewlay Cheese Factory on windy days. 

It is said that around 300 letters objecting to the proposal have been written with a variety of reasons including the risk of car crashes caused by distracted drivers. It is little surprise that the local council should reject the plan as they havn’t much to gain by letting it through unless Dewlay made the unlikely decision to shut shop. 

As a citizen of the UK is it right that remote windmills inconveniencing very few people a little bit should be blocked. What alternative power sources are the blockers proposing. A nuclear power station on someone elses doorstep or a barrage across Morecambe Bay?  I pass Dewlay a few times a year and it appears to be quite isolated. When I get out of my car either in Garstang or Scorton I’m met by noise from the motorway that really does cause irritation. There are a couple of lines of pylons in the Garstang area as well.

 It’s a bit like the on-going war between Cantaxx and the locals about storing gas underground in Wyre. I have a lot of sympathy with locals about the risks involved but also noted that the government said the UK has the lowest amount of gas storage in Europe and is therefore vulnerable to shortages. Once again local opposition is a factor.

 Where safety is a factor there must be restrictions but if a few people can see and even fewer hear a single turbine in the distance as well as some pylons and a motorway should we have sympathy.

 As a final test I looked out of our window and there is a small hill over roofs about 500yds away. I think it would be enhanced by an impressive 400ft high wind turbine. Although I don’t believe in carte blanche situation of windmills. Shame they aren’t like the old windmills which brings on another stream of mixed thoughts.

More on Digital Switchover

Went on a visit to my old aunt south of Preston. She had a letter from an alleged Switchover Help Scheme saying the BBC can help you switch to digital TV. It mentioned a company called DSHS Ltd sounds a bit like DHSS, first sign of a spoof. At the bottom it says it’s from Eaga Ltd, is this a joke. I once saw a sandwich caravan with Eaga Bites on the side.

It’s only £40 for a box, new aerial (if you need it) and after care service. Sounds too good to be true.

On searching the internet this appears to be a genuine arrangement for the over 75’s although Help the Aged and AGE Concern have nothing about it on their websites. Then again I’m never keen on national arrangements, I wonder what their criteria are for new aerials, not that it matters at £40 all in, but I wouldn’t like it to fall down. If it’s an all in deal is it in the companies interest to change your aerial or do they get extra from the BBC for doing it?

As I’d said in my last note, a person said on the radio this morning that a new aerial should not be necessary.

My aunt is the sort of person who won’t understand 2 remotes, so should she get a new TV or a multi-remote. Although I have trouble with my multi-remote so 2 remotes are probably better. If it doesn’t work out a new TV will be the last call.

Overall it sounds like it might be a good thing, need to find out some more.